Skip to main content

AIGarth's Controversial AI Launch: Why Qubic's Math Fails Are Raising Eyebrows in the Blockchain Community

· By Dave Wolfy Wealth · 3 min read

In a world where artificial intelligence and blockchain technology are reshaping industries, AIGarth, a new AI model launched by Qubic, finds itself at the center of controversy.

This initiative, under the guidance of Sergey Ivancheglo, aims to marry the realms of AI with blockchain innovation.

However, skepticism has surfaced as early tests of AIGarth have shown alarming mathematical failures, sparking debate about the validity and future of Qubic's model.

This article delves into the implications of AIGarth's miscalculations, the audacious claims of its creators, and the intricate link between the blockchain community and AI aspirations.

Crypto News, Articles and Reports

AIGarth

Key Takeaways

  • AIGarth's significant math errors have sparked widespread criticism within the blockchain community.
  • Qubic defends its AI model's failures by arguing for a distinction between true intelligence and mere memorization.
  • The financial repercussions of AIGarth's shortcomings are evident, with a reported
    7.7% decrease in Qubic's token value.

The Miscalculations of AIGarth: A Closer Look at Qubic's Flawed AI

The launch of AIGarth, an artificial intelligence model developed by Qubic, has sparked significant controversy and public scrutiny.

Previously known for their attempt at a 51% attack on the Monero blockchain, Qubic's ambitions have been further complicated by AIGarth's glaring miscalculations in basic arithmetic; notably, the model stated incorrect answers such as '1+1=-114' and '1+2=28.' Critics have raised serious doubts about the viability of Qubic's AI initiatives, questioning the foundation of a system that produces such fundamental errors.

Sergey Ivancheglo, Qubic's founder, has defended AIGarth by asserting that the model operates on a principle of intelligence rather than merely rote memorization.

He contends that many humans often rely on memory for simple calculations instead of engaging in genuine cognitive processing.

This philosophy underpins the innovative yet controversial structure of Qubic's AI training, which leverages the computational power of miners to enhance artificial neural networks (ANN).

With aspirations of developing artificial general intelligence (AGI), Qubic's approach typifies their unique 'Useful Proof-of-Work' concept, merging blockchain mining with AI research.

Yet, AIGarth's continued public failures have resulted in a notable decline in Qubic's token value, reportedly dropping by
7.7%.

As Qubic navigates the challenges of merging advanced AI with blockchain technology, the scrutiny surrounding AIGarth raises questions about the future trajectory of both its AI model and its broader aspirations in the tech landscape.

Qubic's Controversial Methods: The Intersection of Blockchain and AI Development

In the realm of emerging technologies, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with blockchain mechanics is an area generating considerable excitement—and controversy.

Qubic's ambitious venture into this intersection has raised eyebrows, particularly with its latest initiative, AIGarth.

By positioning AIGarth as a pioneering AI model, Qubic aims to redefine what it means to harness computational resources traditionally associated with cryptocurrency mining.

Their strategy revolves around a framework where miners input their computing resources into a system designed to train artificial neural networks (ANN) gifted with learning capabilities beyond basic memory.

The rationale behind this approach implies a belief in the potential for such a model to evolve into artificial general intelligence (AGI) over time.

However, the public outcry over AIGarth's mathematical blunders underscores a deeper concern—can Qubic align its vision with functional reality?

As the platform grapples with its dual-role challenges and the ramifications of its experimental methodologies, stakeholders in both the blockchain and AI communities are left to ponder the implications for the future of decentralized technology.

By Wolfy Wealth - Empowering crypto investors since 2016

Subscribe to Wolfy Wealth PRO


Disclosure: Authors may be crypto investors mentioned in this newsletter. Wolfy Wealth Crypto newsletter, does not represent an offer to trade securities or other financial instruments. Our analyses, information and investment strategies are for informational purposes only, in order to spread knowledge about the crypto market. Any investments in variable income may cause partial or total loss of the capital used. Therefore, the recipient of this newsletter should always develop their own analyses and investment strategies. In addition, any investment decisions should be based on the investor's risk profile.

About the author

Dave Wolfy Wealth Dave Wolfy Wealth
Updated on Sep 5, 2025