Skip to main content

Why the BIS Report Raises Red Flags on Stablecoins: Understanding the Risks and Future of Digital Currencies

· By Mike Wolfy Wealth · 3 min read

In recent times, the rise of digital currencies has sparked interest and concern among policymakers, financial institutions, and investors alike.

Among these, stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to traditional assets like fiat currency—have gained significant attention due to their promise of stability and efficiency in transactions.

However, a comprehensive report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has raised crucial questions about their viability as a trustworthy component of the global monetary system.

This article will delve into the findings of the BIS, exploring their implications for the future of digital currencies and the essential criteria that stablecoins must meet to ensure the integrity and functionality of financial systems.

Crypto News, Articles and Reports

Why the BIS Report Raises Red Flags on Stablecoins: Understanding the Risks and Future of Digital Currencies

Key Takeaways

  • The BIS report identifies stablecoins' failure to meet critical monetary criteria, raising concerns about their reliability.
  • Stablecoins pose significant risks to financial integrity and sovereignty, potentially facilitating illicit activities.
  • While skeptical of stablecoins, the BIS highlights the potential of tokenizing traditional assets for future financial innovations.

Critical Criteria for Stablecoins: A Closer Look at Singleness, Elasticity, and Integrity

In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital finance, stablecoins have emerged as a focal point of discussion, particularly in light of a recent report by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).

This report meticulously examines three essential criteria for stablecoins to effectively function within a monetary system: singleness, elasticity, and integrity.

While stablecoins, such as Tether's USDT, offer advantages, including programmability and quicker transaction capabilities, the BIS report raises critical concerns regarding their ability to maintain financial integrity and protect national monetary sovereignty.

The phenomenon of 'stealth dollarisation'—where stablecoins may undermine local currencies—and the potential for facilitating illicit transactions are highlighted as significant risks.

Moreover, the BIS notes that stablecoins, which are often closely tied to their issuers, may not provide a stable value across the board, unlike central bank currencies that uphold monetary singleness.

This lack of standardization leads to questions of reliability in transactions.

The BIS also critiques the adherence to robust Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) measures among stablecoin issuers, which further diminishes the integrity of the financial system.

Despite its nuanced skepticism towards stablecoins, the BIS recognizes the potential for innovation through the tokenization of traditional assets, including central bank reserves and government bonds.

Such advancements could herald a new era in financial systems, blending stability with the advantages of blockchain technology.

Notably, the report's release did not go unnoticed in the market, as evidenced by Circle’s stock decline, marking a ripple effect stemming from the findings.

This underscores the significant intersection of regulation, innovation, and market response in the ongoing journey toward a digitally optimized monetary environment.

Exploring the Future of Digital Currencies: Risks and Innovations Beyond Stablecoins

The prospect of transitioning from stablecoins to Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) is gaining traction as governments and financial institutions pursue innovative ways to enhance their monetary frameworks.

CBDCs promise to address several limitations of stablecoins, particularly in terms of regulatory oversight and financial system integrity.

Unlike stablecoins, which are often issued by private entities and subjected to various degrees of regulatory scrutiny, CBDCs will be state-backed, providing a higher assurance of value stability and public trust.

Countries like China and Sweden are already in advanced stages of CBDC development, experimenting with pilot programs that could set the stage for a broader rollout.

These digital currencies not only stand to streamline transaction processes through government endorsement but also offer a guard against the risks of 'stealth dollarisation' by maintaining national currency sovereignty.

Furthermore, CBDCs could integrate advanced security technologies to enhance user privacy while ensuring compliance with financial regulations, effectively balancing innovation with accountability.

As financial landscapes continuously evolve, the ongoing discussions about CBDCs might redefine the future of money, merging traditional banking practices with cutting-edge technology.

By Wolfy Wealth - Empowering crypto investors since 2016

Get Wolfy Wealth Premium


Disclosure: Authors may be crypto investors mentioned in this newsletter. Wolfy Wealth Crypto newsletter, does not represent an offer to trade securities or other financial instruments. Our analyses, information and investment strategies are for informational purposes only, in order to spread knowledge about the crypto market. Any investments in variable income may cause partial or total loss of the capital used. Therefore, the recipient of this newsletter should always develop their own analyses and investment strategies. In addition, any investment decisions should be based on the investor's risk profile.

Updated on Jun 25, 2025